The Education System Is Not Failing. It Is Working Exactly As Designed.
And that is the problem.
Every few years, a new report lands. Test scores are down. Children are falling behind. Teachers are leaving. Parents are worried. Politicians announce a review. A working group is formed. Recommendations are published. And then, more or less, everything continues as before.
This has been the cycle for decades.
And most of the conversation around it — the op-eds, the policy papers, the school league tables — treats the problems as bugs. As failures of implementation. As things that could be fixed with better funding, better training, better leadership, better anything.
But what if they are not bugs?
What if the modern education system is not failing to do what it was designed to do — but succeeding at it? And what if what it was designed to do is simply not what your child needs?
The system was built for a different world
Mass public schooling, as it exists today, is a nineteenth century invention.
It was built during the industrial revolution, for the industrial revolution. The architects of that system — in Prussia, in Britain, in the United States — were explicit about its purpose. They needed a workforce that could follow instructions, show up on time, work in shifts, and perform repetitive tasks reliably. They needed literate, numerate, compliant citizens.
They built a system that would produce them.
The model was the factory. Children were sorted by age rather than ability or interest. They moved through a fixed curriculum in fixed time blocks. They were assessed against standardised measures. Deviation from the expected path was treated as a problem to be corrected.
That system — with minor cosmetic updates — is still the system running today.
The smartboards are new. The curriculum documents have been rewritten. There is more talk of wellbeing and creativity and critical thinking. But the fundamental structure — cohorts, timetables, standardised examinations, age-based progression — is unchanged.
Your child is moving through a machine that was built for a world that ended before they were born.
What the data actually says
The global picture is not reassuring.
The PISA rankings — the largest international assessment of student achievement — show that reading, mathematics, and science scores have been flat or declining across most developed nations for over a decade. In England, the most recent results placed students below the average for reading comprehension among OECD countries. In mathematics, improvement has stalled.
But academic performance is only part of the story.
One in six children in the United Kingdom currently meets the threshold for a probable mental health disorder, according to NHS data. That figure has risen sharply over the past decade. Anxiety and depression are now among the most common reasons for school absence. Referrals to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services have increased year on year, while waiting times in many areas now stretch beyond twelve months.
In the United States, the surgeon general has declared an adolescent mental health crisis. In Australia, similar patterns. In most of the developed world, children are spending more time in formal education than any previous generation — and emerging from it more anxious, more disengaged, and less prepared for independent life than the data from half a century ago would have predicted.
These are not the results of underfunding. The UK spends more per pupil in real terms than it did twenty years ago. These are structural outcomes.
What schools are actually teaching
Beyond the academic results and the mental health statistics, there is a quieter problem — one that does not show up in any official measure but that most parents sense if they look honestly.
Schools, as they currently operate, are extraordinarily effective at teaching children how to be students.
How to sit still. How to wait. How to perform for an audience that is assessing them. How to absorb information, hold it long enough to reproduce it on a test, and then release it. How to exist in a large group of their peers for thirty hours a week without falling apart.
These are skills. They are just not particularly useful ones.
What schools are not reliably teaching: how to think independently, how to evaluate information critically, how to manage time without external pressure, how to initiate rather than respond, how to fail productively, how to work with genuine curiosity rather than compliance.
The children coming out of school today are extraordinarily well-practised at following a system. They have spent twelve years doing almost nothing else.
The UK specifically
In England, the situation carries its own particular pressures.
The school inspection regime — driven by Ofsted — has created a culture in which schools optimise relentlessly for what is measured, at the expense of what matters. Headteachers report that the fear of a poor inspection shapes almost every decision made at a school level. Teachers report that the pressure to hit targets has narrowed what they are able to do in the classroom.
The result is a system in which curriculum breadth has contracted, teacher autonomy has diminished, and the space for genuine intellectual exploration — for following a child’s curiosity somewhere unplanned — has shrunk to almost nothing.
The arts have been steadily squeezed. Philosophy is not on the curriculum. Financial literacy is not on the curriculum. Practical life skills are not on the curriculum. But every child will sit a GCSE in subjects they have no interest in and will never use again, at the age of sixteen, in a process that will shape how they feel about learning for the rest of their lives.
Meanwhile, teacher recruitment and retention is in crisis. The Department for Education has missed its secondary school teacher recruitment targets for eleven consecutive years. Class sizes are rising. The adults in the room are stretched too thin to give any individual child meaningful attention — not because they do not care, but because the system does not allow it.
The parents who are paying attention
None of this means every school is bad, or every teacher is failing, or that there is nothing worth salvaging from formal education.
It means that the system, as a whole, was not designed with your specific child in mind — and that the conditions required to raise a genuinely educated, capable, grounded child are not reliably present within it.
The parents who are beginning to act on this are not radicals. They are not opting out of the world. They are simply looking at the evidence — the academic results, the mental health data, the narrowing curriculum, the disappearing teachers — and concluding that waiting to see how it turns out is not good enough.
They want something more deliberate. More personal. More aligned with what they actually believe a good education looks like.
And increasingly, they are building it themselves.
Raising Stewards exists for those parents.
Every week, we explore what education can look like when it is built around the child rather than the system — and what it actually takes to raise a child who is capable, grounded, and prepared for the world as it is.
If you are one of those parents, subscribe below. And if this piece put into words something you have been thinking for a while, share it with someone who needs to read it.
Raising Stewards is published by Stewards.One — an online homeschooling school for families who want an education that develops the whole child: academically, practically, and in character. Learn more at stewards.one
The Stewards Team